military’s space weapons that presumably would deter China from firing the first shot against a satellite are classified. Any type of escalation can result in miscalculations and human errors which is why a space war is a “conflict that no one wants,” he said. The Space Force will invest in new capabilities to deter and win if deterrence fails, Kendall said. The implications for space are significant, he said, as “China has moved aggressively to weaponize space.” Kendall, who was sworn in late July as the civilian leader of the Air Force and the Space Force, said the United States is in a “long-term strategic competition” with China. ![]() ![]() Space Force as an independent service branch. Space Command - which had been deactivated since 2002 - and create the U.S. in a ‘long-term strategic competition’Ī competition for space dominance between the United States and rival powers China and Russia prompted the Trump administration and Congress in 2019 to re-establish U.S. “e are only starting to grapple with… what space warfighting really means,” Shaw said. ![]() Conceivably, naval or aerial forces would be called upon to take retaliatory action. If that happened, the Defense Department would have to decide how to respond to that threat. Those questions are now being debated as Space Command develops what Shaw describes as “space warfighting doctrine.” A laser blinding a satellite is just an example of the types of attacks the U.S. “But how do we change that? How do we make it more difficult for a potential adversary to think they could succeed in depriving us of our space capabilities?” John Hyten, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, “likes to talk about satellites as being ‘big fat juicy targets.’” “It is impossible to overstate the importance of space-based systems to national security,” Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said in a keynote speech at the symposium. But as the Pentagon has grown increasingly dependent on space, satellites are becoming strategic assets and coveted targets for adversaries. Military space assets like satellites and ground systems typically have been considered “support” equipment that provide valuable services such as communications, navigation data and early warning of missile launches. satellites from attacks and figuring out how to respond if hostile acts do occur. This puts Space Command in charge of protecting U.S. Space Command is responsible for military operations in the space domain, which starts at the Kármán line, some 100 kilometers (62 miles) above the Earth’s surface. space birds "big, fat, juicy targets.U.S. military hardware with homemade IEDs? At approximately $1.7 billion a pop, American space birds present attractive sitting ducks. Remember when insurgents in Afghanistan destroyed expensive U.S. Chinese strategists call these disruptive technologies an "Assassin's Mace," a concept that conveys an inferior military countering superior one by leveling a playing field with much less expensive options. forces psychologically and disrupt the "kill chain," preventing our weapons from reaching their targets. The Russians believe that taking away what they perceive as the technological "crutch," could paralyze U.S. ![]() By crippling our satellites – thus disabling communications, reconnaissance, missile warning, navigation, command and control, and other missions – these adversaries seek to negate America's superior conventional firepower. Both have developed doctrines and capabilities to deafen and blind our forces. Having watched American warfighters’ tactics in conflict zones across the globe, Russia and China have concluded that our reliance on technology is a vulnerability to be exploited.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |